Diaz,
Junot. The brief wondrous life of Oscar
Wao, Faber and Faber , London,
2008. (Pages 335, paperback)
Rating:
0/10
Like
most book clubs, the book club I visit once a month decides on the monthly
book. We try to elevate our literary level by selecting something that has or
can win literary prizes. We may read the Grishams, the Archers and the Chetan
Bhagats of this world but at our own risk, not as members of the book club. The
book selected for this month is The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao, (the freak
title reportedly a tribute to Hemingway’s short story The Short Happy Life of
Francis Macomber).
This
book has won the Pulitzer prize for fiction (2008), at least three other
prizes, and appeared in more than 35 the best-book-of-the-year lists. No wonder
our book club wanted to read this.
This
is what I remember after reading the first one hundred pages.
-It
talks about Fuku and Zafa, whatever they are.
-In
the smallest possible print used as footnotes, the history of Dominican Republic
appears. You can read the same in Wikipedia, with the added advantage of being
able to adjust the font size.
-
Sometimes it is written in the first person, sometimes in the second and
sometimes in the third. But the first person is not always the same.
-half
the words are in English (because they looked familiar), and the other half are
not English. (I am told they are Spanish). It’s not that you have English
paragraphs followed by the Spanish. The same sentence has a few English and a
few Spanish words.
-Nothing
happens. (or at least nothing happens in the text in English language.). Words
after words after words appear in front of your eyes. They don’t flow, each one
is like a hurdle over which a reader must jump.
I
became tired of this hurdle race after 100 pages. I had decided that no matter
what I must finish the book club book. After all, it’s only one book a month. I
am free to read all other books of my own choice. But this book beat me. It
became so intolerable, that I gave it up and cried. Cried for the lost hours.
Cried for all the prizes the book had won.
Either
something is critically wrong with me. Or with the rest of the world.
Verdict:
If you think I have been uncharitable in giving the book a rating of zero, you
are wrong. I could have given a negative scoring. For wasting precious time in
my limited life. Instead of those 100 pages, I could have finished a racy
normal murder mystery. Junot Diaz’s classic tells us how not to write a book.
If you don’t trust me, please read it, and let me know if you understand
something.